I am reading Bloodlines
by John Piper right now, a fantastic little book about race, that I plan to
write a post about very soon (for books with one controlling thesis such as
this one I find it best to wait until I have finished in order to say much
about it). But that is not the purpose of this post; the purpose of this post
is to use Piper's own words here to talk about why I enjoy him so much and see
in him a great blessing to the church.
The first two
chapters of the book are autobiographical and this excerpt comes from the first
chapter:
"If any of this sounds valiant, don't be too impressed. I am not a good example of an urban pastor. Because of the way I believe God calls me to use my time, I don't have any significant relationships with most of my neighbors. Nor does our church reflect the diversity of this neighborhood. There is diversity, but nothing like the statistics above [Piper's church is in the most ethnically diverse region of the Twin Cities].Probably I could have been far more effective in immediate urban impact in this neighborhood if I had not written books or carried on a wider speaking ministry. Some thank me for this ministry, and others think I have made a mistake. Again, you may see why I cherish and cling to the gospel of Jesus.The Lord will be my judge someday. I will give an account to him of how I served him. I expect that as he goes down the list of the choices I have made, none will have a perfectly pure motivation, and many will appear as unwise in the bright light of his holiness. I hope I have been a good steward of my gifts and time. But my confidence in the judgment is not in that. It's in the perfection of Jesus that God has credited to me through faith and in the punishment Jesus endured for me. . ." (39-40)
What I appreciated so
much with this, given that it had little to do with the main topic of the book
is that Piper is addressing the rise of the so-called celebrity pastor and the
backlash it has created.
There are two main
criticisms that I have encountered of the celebrity pastor, one comical, the
other uncharitable. The comical one is that the critic of the pastors could
become famous if they wanted, but humble-hearted servant that they are, they
choose to toil in anonymity in a small congregation. These men view fame as a
matter of will, apart from talent or the work of God. Focusing on
"ordinary pastors" is a great thing*, but the dismissive "well, I
don't want to be a celebrity pastor" thing is laughable. If you have to
say that, you really do. But, good, you will probably never have that problem.
The uncharitable
criticism is one that removes any sense of agency from these celebrity pastors.
What I mean by this is it treats these men as if they are not aware that there
are other ways of doing their vocation and as if they have not thought deeply
and prayed fervently over the ministry decisions they have made. That they sort
of fell into this and now they don't know what to do. Piper here shows the care
with which he makes his decisions, as well as the omnipresent awareness that
there will come a day when he will give an account for his actions to his Lord.
For better or for
worse, podcasts and the internet have shrunk our world to where it is not
uncommon for a spiritually hungry person to take in more content (audio, video,
or written) from a celebrity pastor in a faraway locale than their local pastor
in their local church. Of course this can be a dangerous thing, both for
celebrity pastor and for spiritually hungry person judging his pastor against
the speaking/writing ability of this celebrity pastor, but it is not wholly
bad. It can be very good. I thank God for John Piper and Mark Driscoll and Matt
Chandler and others like them, because even when I disagree with them I can
appreciate their passion for the gospel and the church. Pastors who write books
aren't out there actively encouraging people to be dissatisfied with their
local church and move to Minneapolis or Seattle.
Piper loves the
Church, the whole Church, and feels called to use his gifts in a specific way.
Has he made wrong decisions? Yep. Will he make more? Sure. But the purpose of
life isn't to wait for perfection and then act, to continually weight every
decision to the point of inaction, or to sit back and criticize someone who is
working night and day to bless God and his church. Celebrity pastors make
mistakes; so do ordinary ones. Ultimately, it is between them and the Lord.
Piper is very cognizant of this fact; I hope his critics will remember the same
thing.
*One of the ironies to me of publicizing the ordinary pastor movement, if one can be said to exist, is that it tries to popularize the ordinary. An uncharitable view of this, which of course I would never take, could see this as trying to make being ordinary famous. Plus, no one starts a blog and puts their stuff out on the internet in the hope that no one ever will read it. I wonder how often these ordinary pastors check their web traffic?
No comments:
Post a Comment